PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCIX vs. GSSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than GSSRX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GCCIX has outperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 5.07%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.


GCCIX

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
18.82%
6M
19.60%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
5.07%

GSSRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.39%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
18.82%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-14.89%4.31%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
0.83%6.57%4.53%5.28%-6.06%-0.86%5.85%6.79%-0.02%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and GSSRX is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.01

The correlation between GCCIX and GSSRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.01 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GSSRX
GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCCIXGSSRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

2.16

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

3.99

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.53

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

3.30

+0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.31

14.65

-3.33

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the GSSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and GSSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCCIXGSSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.16

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.85

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

1.01

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.98

-1.13

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than GSSRX's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and GSSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCIXGSSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-9.03%

-81.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-1.62%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-1.62%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.78%

-8.88%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

-9.03%

-48.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.56%

-0.10%

-70.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.43%

-1.26%

-68.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

0.36%

+2.40%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) at 0.71%. This indicates that GCCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCCIXGSSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

0.71%

+4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

1.77%

+10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

2.22%

+12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

2.43%

+16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

2.42%

+17.60%

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCCIX vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.54%, more than GSSRX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
13.54%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
4.35%4.18%3.58%2.36%1.59%1.40%2.20%2.87%2.56%2.21%2.04%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCCIX and GSSRX have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCIX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to GSSRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCIX dropped -90.80% vs GSSRX's -9.03%.

GCCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCCIX and GSSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer