GCCIX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GCCIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 29, 2007. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GCCIX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCCIX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.11% | 15.45% | 5.92% | -9.65% | 15.70% | 33.42% | -23.01% | 16.75% | -14.89% | 4.31% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -2.68% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GCCIX has underperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 6.16%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return.
GCCIX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 19.69%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCCIX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCCIX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GCCIX
GSIFX
GCCIX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCCIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 0.85 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.24 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.03 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 4.10 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCCIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 0.85 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.34 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.50 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.31 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCCIX and GSIFX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCCIX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, more than GSIFX's 2.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.10% | 16.09% | 4.08% | 4.20% | 10.41% | 16.46% | 0.36% | 10.81% | 1.47% | 5.88% | 0.84% | 0.36% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.24% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GCCIX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than GSIFX's maximum drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCCIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.80% | -59.25% | -31.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -12.15% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.78% | -31.94% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.76% | -35.00% | -22.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.72% | -8.82% | -62.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.41% | -15.30% | -54.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.06% | +0.32% |
Volatility
GCCIX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 5.48%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCCIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 7.31% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 11.47% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 17.09% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 16.77% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 17.34% | +2.79% |