PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCIX vs. BRCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than BRCYX's 15.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GCCIX has underperformed BRCYX with an annualized return of 4.26%, while BRCYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.45% annualized return.


GCCIX

1D
-1.75%
1M
-8.85%
YTD
8.08%
6M
6.76%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
4.26%

BRCYX

1D
-2.47%
1M
-12.51%
YTD
15.67%
6M
14.33%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
8.08%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-14.89%4.31%
BRCYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund
15.67%18.82%5.70%-3.15%7.94%19.54%7.89%4.49%-12.03%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and BRCYX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.79

The correlation between GCCIX and BRCYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. BRCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BRCYX
BRCYX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BRCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCCIXBRCYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.86

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.95

9.05

-3.10

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the BRCYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and BRCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than BRCYX's maximum drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and BRCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCIXBRCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-60.05%

-30.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-17.02%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.50%

-17.02%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.78%

-20.42%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

-38.09%

-19.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.22%

-17.02%

-56.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.42%

-27.14%

-42.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.51%

-0.52%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 3.65%, while Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCCIXBRCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

4.83%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

16.06%

-3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

17.89%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

15.77%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

14.32%

+5.64%

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BRCYX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCCIX vs. BRCYX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, more than BRCYX's 11.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRCYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund
11.85%13.71%4.95%3.71%9.93%16.64%0.00%0.91%0.25%0.01%2.74%0.00%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
14.88%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GCCIX and BRCYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BRCYX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to GCCIX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCIX dropped -90.80% vs BRCYX's -60.05%.

BRCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCCIX and BRCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer