PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCIX vs. ARCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
14.11%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-14.89%4.31%
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
17.59%20.76%7.19%-0.50%20.97%39.48%8.11%17.68%-17.83%10.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly lower than ARCNX's 17.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GCCIX has underperformed ARCNX with an annualized return of 6.16%, while ARCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


GCCIX

1D
-0.63%
1M
4.19%
YTD
14.11%
6M
19.69%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
6.16%

ARCNX

1D
0.47%
1M
5.67%
YTD
17.59%
6M
26.30%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
18.41%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ARCNX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. ARCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCNX
ARCNX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ARCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCCIXARCNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.96

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.45

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.14

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.38

9.87

-3.48

GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the ARCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and ARCNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCCIXARCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.96

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.97

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.73

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.29

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and ARCNX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, more than ARCNX's 11.54% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
14.10%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
11.54%13.57%1.89%7.45%9.45%18.31%0.09%4.98%0.29%0.01%4.69%0.00%

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than ARCNX's maximum drawdown of -55.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and ARCNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCIXARCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-55.17%

-35.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-10.10%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.78%

-20.30%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

-32.80%

-24.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.72%

-0.56%

-71.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.41%

-26.26%

-43.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.21%

+0.17%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. ARCNX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GCCIXARCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

5.33%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

12.61%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

15.93%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

19.16%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

17.46%

+2.67%