GCCHX vs. LSGGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GCCHX (GMO Climate Change Fund) and LSGGX (Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GCCHX returned 1.61%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for LSGGX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCCHX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LSGGX.

Performance

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) and Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCHX achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than LSGGX's -9.09% return.

GCCHX

• 1D: -3.95%
• 1M: -5.60%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 12.94%
• 1Y: 57.73%
• 3Y*: 2.68%
• 5Y*: 1.61%
• 10Y*: —

LSGGX

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: -9.09%
• 6M: -10.37%
• 1Y: -3.83%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund	15.37%	39.25%	-25.63%	-6.85%	-10.39%	21.84%	42.82%	27.36%	-16.35%	26.15%
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	-9.09%	16.84%	23.30%	36.10%	-25.98%	5.89%	35.25%	30.63%	-6.70%	19.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCHX and LSGGX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between GCCHX and LSGGX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GCCHX vs. LSGGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCHX

GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

LSGGX

LSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
LSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) and Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCCHX	LSGGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	-0.13	+2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	-0.06	+3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	0.99	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	-0.12	+5.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.82	-0.29	+16.11

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the LSGGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCHX and LSGGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCHX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than LSGGX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCHX and LSGGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCCHX	LSGGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.32%	-37.72%	-16.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	-21.08%	+9.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.03%	-22.21%	-29.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.32%	-37.72%	-16.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.45%	-14.07%	+3.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.86%	-7.63%	-6.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	7.95%	-4.04%

Volatility

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) at 6.97%. This indicates that GCCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSGGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCCHX	LSGGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	6.97%	+2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.18%	14.14%	+4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.16%	18.45%	+5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.20%	22.17%	+5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.23%	20.57%	+4.66%

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCHX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than LSGGX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCCHX vs. LSGGX - Dividend Comparison

GCCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than LSGGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund	1.30%	1.51%	0.66%	0.96%	2.24%	25.43%	5.42%	4.03%	2.62%	3.43%
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	0.33%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	7.77%	7.38%	6.15%	5.74%	4.78%	3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCCHX and LSGGX in my portfolio?

GCCHX and LSGGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCCHX or LSGGX?

GCCHX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to LSGGX (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCHX dropped -54.32% vs LSGGX's -37.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.