PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCHX vs. DGSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) and Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCHX achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than DGSCX's 1.54% return.


GCCHX

1D
-3.95%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
15.37%
6M
12.94%
1Y
57.73%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*

DGSCX

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.54%
6M
0.87%
1Y
-6.23%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
15.37%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%26.15%
DGSCX
Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund
1.54%-0.96%9.71%24.03%-24.11%11.23%29.79%23.02%-16.82%21.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCHX and DGSCX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between GCCHX and DGSCX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCCHX vs. DGSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DGSCX
DGSCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DGSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DGSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) and Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCCHXDGSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.94

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

-0.30

+5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

-0.64

+16.46

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the DGSCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCHX and DGSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCHX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, smaller than the maximum DGSCX drawdown of -68.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCHX and DGSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCHXDGSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.32%

-68.18%

+13.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-16.85%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.03%

-18.04%

-33.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.32%

-37.49%

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

-9.40%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-19.66%

+5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

7.81%

-3.90%

Volatility

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX) at 3.25%. This indicates that GCCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCCHXDGSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

3.25%

+6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.18%

9.88%

+8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.16%

12.50%

+11.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.20%

17.96%

+9.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.23%

19.20%

+6.03%

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCHX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than DGSCX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCCHX vs. DGSCX - Dividend Comparison

GCCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than DGSCX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGSCX
Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund
4.54%4.61%14.50%0.84%2.64%30.56%4.16%7.03%21.96%7.99%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.30%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCCHX and DGSCX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to DGSCX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCHX dropped -54.32% vs DGSCX's -68.18%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCCHX and DGSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer