GCC vs. COMB
GCC (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. GCC is actively managed, while COMB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCC returned 11.45%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for COMB. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GCC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
GCC vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCC achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 20.27% return.
GCC
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.15%
COMB
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 33.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.05M | $1.52M | $1.73M | |
| $824.65K | $1.06M | $1.11M |
GCC vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.89% | 20.01% | 15.13% | -3.72% | 7.74% | 19.96% | 1.38% | 7.07% | -8.69% | 0.58% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 20.27% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCC and COMB is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GCC and COMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCC vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
GCC
COMB
GCC vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCC | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.26 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.77 | 7.05 | -1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCC vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCC drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCC and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCC | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.19% | -33.50% | -29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.86% | -14.84% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.86% | -14.84% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -26.63% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.27% | -9.28% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.68% | -12.01% | -22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 4.75% | +0.43% |
Volatility
GCC vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) is 3.37%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that GCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCC | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 5.27% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 14.00% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 17.81% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 16.74% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 15.18% | -0.34% |
GCC vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCC vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
GCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than COMB's 7.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.52% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 5.78% | 6.64% | 3.51% | 3.68% | 22.49% | 9.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCC and COMB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMB has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to GCC (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCC dropped -63.19% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 5-year performance, GCC leads with 11.45% vs 10.10% for COMB. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GCC has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCC has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 10.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GCC.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.52%, compared with 5.78% for GCC.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GCC and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCC and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer