GCC vs. RING
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).
GCC and RING are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCC is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Jan 24, 2008. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GCC or RING.
Correlation
The correlation between GCC and RING is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GCC vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GCC:
1.66
RING:
2.27
GCC:
2.37
RING:
2.79
GCC:
1.28
RING:
1.36
GCC:
0.55
RING:
1.31
GCC:
5.44
RING:
7.84
GCC:
3.74%
RING:
9.09%
GCC:
12.23%
RING:
31.49%
GCC:
-63.19%
RING:
-79.48%
GCC:
-23.62%
RING:
-22.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCC achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 22.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GCC has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 2.68%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 8.83% annualized return.
GCC
5.58%
1.84%
11.62%
20.06%
9.85%
2.68%
RING
22.16%
12.19%
5.55%
64.27%
8.80%
8.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCC vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GCC vs. RING — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GCC
RING
GCC vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GCC vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
GCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than RING's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 3.32% | 3.51% | 3.68% | 22.49% | 9.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 1.17% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.82% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.42% | 0.97% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
GCC vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCC drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCC and RING. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GCC vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) is 2.20%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that GCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.