PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCAVX vs. BRSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (GCAVX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCAVX achieves a 16.19% return, which is significantly lower than BRSIX's 20.12% return.


GCAVX

1D
1.46%
1M
3.55%
YTD
16.19%
6M
16.68%
1Y
40.32%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*

BRSIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
5.49%
YTD
20.12%
6M
22.37%
1Y
59.70%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GCAVX
GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund
16.19%15.27%11.16%22.72%-14.22%35.66%2.38%7.27%
BRSIX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund
20.12%20.09%14.92%11.46%-23.43%-1.93%25.50%4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GCAVX and BRSIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019

0.80

The correlation between GCAVX and BRSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCAVX vs. BRSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCAVX
GCAVX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GCAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GCAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BRSIX
BRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (GCAVX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCAVXBRSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

5.56

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

17.10

-3.29

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCAVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the BRSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCAVX and BRSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCAVXBRSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.72

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.00

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.44

+0.05

Drawdowns

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCAVX drawdown since its inception was -48.22%, smaller than the maximum BRSIX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAVX and BRSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCAVXBRSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.22%

-61.79%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-11.46%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.15%

-30.80%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

-53.66%

+27.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-2.45%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-15.64%

+7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.71%

-0.67%

Volatility

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (GCAVX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCAVXBRSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.37%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.63%

15.32%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

23.42%

-4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

24.42%

-2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.64%

24.11%

+2.53%

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCAVX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BRSIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCAVX vs. BRSIX - Dividend Comparison

GCAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than BRSIX's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRSIX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund
0.86%1.03%0.62%0.89%2.12%1.32%3.46%1.30%16.12%13.71%8.25%12.77%
GCAVX
GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund
2.53%2.94%1.68%1.85%10.92%41.19%1.54%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCAVX and BRSIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRSIX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to GCAVX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCAVX dropped -48.22% vs BRSIX's -61.79%.

BRSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCAVX and BRSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer