PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCAVX vs. TSLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (GCAVX) and Transamerica Small Cap Value (TSLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCAVX achieves a 18.50% return, which is significantly lower than TSLTX's 24.56% return.


GCAVX

1D
1.47%
1M
2.67%
YTD
18.50%
6M
15.82%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*

TSLTX

1D
1.26%
1M
3.70%
YTD
24.56%
6M
22.43%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GCAVX
GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund
18.50%15.27%11.16%22.72%-14.22%35.66%2.38%7.27%
TSLTX
Transamerica Small Cap Value
24.56%9.56%12.59%8.84%-12.51%31.10%5.99%6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GCAVX and TSLTX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2019

0.95

The correlation between GCAVX and TSLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCAVX vs. TSLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCAVX
GCAVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GCAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GCAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLTX
TSLTX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TSLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (GCAVX) and Transamerica Small Cap Value (TSLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCAVXTSLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.48

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

6.04

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.60

20.12

-5.52

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCAVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the TSLTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCAVX and TSLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCAVX drawdown since its inception was -48.22%, smaller than the maximum TSLTX drawdown of -55.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAVX and TSLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCAVXTSLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.22%

-55.58%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-7.73%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.15%

-26.62%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

-55.58%

+29.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-15.97%

+14.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-28.38%

+19.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.32%

+0.71%

Volatility

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund (GCAVX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Transamerica Small Cap Value (TSLTX) at 4.83%. This indicates that GCAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCAVXTSLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

4.83%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

11.19%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.89%

16.61%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

50.00%

-28.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.59%

43.49%

-16.90%

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCAVX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLTX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCAVX vs. TSLTX - Dividend Comparison

GCAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than TSLTX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GCAVX
GMO U.S. Small Cap Value Fund
2.48%2.94%1.68%1.85%10.92%41.19%1.54%0.83%0.00%
TSLTX
Transamerica Small Cap Value
4.32%5.38%27.99%2.99%21.70%77.67%0.24%4.26%11.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GCAVX and TSLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCAVX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to TSLTX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCAVX dropped -48.22% vs TSLTX's -55.58%.

TSLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCAVX and TSLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer