GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
GC40.DE (Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR) and H4ZA.DE (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Europe Equities funds - GC40.DE tracks the CAC 40® ESG while H4ZA.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GC40.DE returned 9.36%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for H4ZA.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GC40.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZA.DE.
Performance
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GC40.DE achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZA.DE's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, GC40.DE has underperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 9.36%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.
GC40.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
H4ZA.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC40.DE Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR | 0.95% | 15.22% | 2.62% | 20.63% | -8.91% | 30.85% | -4.80% | 32.50% | -9.74% | 13.31% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 7.24% | 22.26% | 13.81% | 22.59% | -8.87% | 23.72% | -2.73% | 30.07% | -11.96% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC40.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GC40.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GC40.DE
H4ZA.DE
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR (GC40.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GC40.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 1.43 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 4.85 | -3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GC40.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.98 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.69 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GC40.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, roughly equal to the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC40.DE and H4ZA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC40.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -38.41% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -10.97% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -16.40% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.17% | -23.26% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.73% | -38.41% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -0.50% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -7.84% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.24% | +0.98% |
Volatility
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR (GC40.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC40.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.95% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 12.99% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 15.99% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.50% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 18.17% | -0.21% |
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GC40.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GC40.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison
GC40.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC40.DE Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 2.44% | 2.49% | 5.35% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 2.84% | 3.55% | 2.73% | 2.85% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC40.DE and H4ZA.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GC40.DE.
GC40.DE tracks CAC 40® ESG, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GC40.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.
Find the right allocation for GC40.DE and H4ZA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer