GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE
GC40.DE (Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR) and LYP6.DE (Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - GC40.DE tracks the CAC 40® ESG while LYP6.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GC40.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for LYP6.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GC40.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYP6.DE.
Performance
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GC40.DE achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than LYP6.DE's 7.48% return.
GC40.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
LYP6.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC40.DE Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR | 0.95% | 15.22% | 2.62% | 20.63% | -8.91% | 30.85% | -4.80% | 32.50% | -9.74% | 2.28% |
LYP6.DE Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc | 7.48% | 20.82% | 8.25% | 15.97% | -10.40% | 24.81% | -1.72% | 28.59% | -11.28% | 2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC40.DE and LYP6.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between GC40.DE and LYP6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GC40.DE
LYP6.DE
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR (GC40.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GC40.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 1.74 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 6.63 | -5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GC40.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.28 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.67 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GC40.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, which is greater than LYP6.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC40.DE and LYP6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC40.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -35.51% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -9.45% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -16.26% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.17% | -20.71% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -1.62% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -4.84% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 2.49% | +1.73% |
Volatility
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF - EUR (GC40.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.35%. This indicates that GC40.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC40.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.35% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 10.65% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 12.90% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 14.41% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 15.86% | +2.10% |
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GC40.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GC40.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GC40.DE nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GC40.DE and LYP6.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GC40.DE.
GC40.DE tracks CAC 40® ESG, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GC40.DE and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.
Find the right allocation for GC40.DE and LYP6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer