GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO
GBUL.TO (Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF) and NNRG.NEO (Ninepoint Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBUL.TO is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while NNRG.NEO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. GBUL.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for NNRG.NEO.
Performance
GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GBUL.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NNRG.NEO
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 43.04%
- 6M
- 35.64%
- 1Y
- 66.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 30.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
GBUL.TO
NNRG.NEO
GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBUL.TO | NNRG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.97 | — |
Drawdowns
GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBUL.TO | NNRG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -6.38% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -12.09% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.15% | — |
Volatility
GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBUL.TO | NNRG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 24.73% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 34.23% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 34.22% | — |
GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBUL.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NNRG.NEO's 1.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBUL.TO vs. NNRG.NEO - Dividend Comparison
GBUL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NNRG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GBUL.TO Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NNRG.NEO Ninepoint Energy ETF | 0.52% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GBUL.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBUL.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.79% for NNRG.NEO.
GBUL.TO is categorized as Gold, while NNRG.NEO is Energy Equities. GBUL.TO tracks LBMA Gold Price, while NNRG.NEO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GBUL.TO and 1.79% for NNRG.NEO.
Find the right allocation for GBUL.TO and NNRG.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer