PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GBUL.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUG.TO

1D
-3.59%
1M
-8.22%
YTD
-1.46%
6M
0.86%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
26.26%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBUL.TO

HUG.TO
HUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
HUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO) and Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBUL.TOHUG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

Drawdowns

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBUL.TOHUG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

Volatility

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBUL.TOHUG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUL.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HUG.TO's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBUL.TO vs. HUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBUL.TO nor HUG.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, GBUL.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBUL.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for HUG.TO.

GBUL.TO tracks LBMA Gold Price, while HUG.TO tracks Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GBUL.TO and 0.54% for HUG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBUL.TO and HUG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer