GBUG vs. SPPP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) and SPPP (Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott, while SPPP is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Sprott. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GBUG returned 46.03% vs 28.81% for SPPP. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBUG charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for SPPP.

Performance

GBUG vs. SPPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBUG achieves a -11.03% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP's -18.76% return.

GBUG

• 1D: -9.73%
• 1M: -15.35%
• YTD: -11.03%
• 6M: -2.89%
• 1Y: 46.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPPP

• 1D: -6.17%
• 1M: -15.76%
• YTD: -18.76%
• 6M: -6.04%
• 1Y: 28.81%
• 3Y*: 3.72%
• 5Y*: -7.31%
• 10Y*: 7.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBUG vs. SPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	-11.03%	119.00%
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust	-18.76%	71.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GBUG and SPPP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.64

The correlation between GBUG and SPPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GBUG vs. SPPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 28
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

SPPP

SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 19
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBUG vs. SPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GBUG	SPPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	0.56	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.02	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.14	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	0.73	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.65	1.61	+2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GBUG vs. SPPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the SPPP Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBUG and SPPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBUG	SPPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	0.56	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.42	0.08	+1.34

Drawdowns

GBUG vs. SPPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBUG drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum SPPP drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBUG and SPPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBUG	SPPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.18%	-59.09%	+25.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.18%	-39.42%	+6.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-58.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.18%	-39.42%	+6.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.75%	-26.48%	+18.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.70%	17.91%	-5.21%

Volatility

GBUG vs. SPPP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) has a higher volatility of 16.65% compared to Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) at 10.98%. This indicates that GBUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBUG	SPPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.65%	10.98%	+5.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.73%	45.98%	-5.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.66%	51.37%	-2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.05%	34.99%	+13.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.05%	33.15%	+14.90%

GBUG vs. SPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than SPPP's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBUG vs. SPPP - Dividend Comparison

GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.75%	1.56%
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBUG and SPPP in my portfolio?

GBUG and SPPP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GBUG or SPPP?

GBUG has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to SPPP (10.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBUG dropped -33.18% vs SPPP's -59.09%.

Which ETF is better, GBUG or SPPP?

On 1-year performance, GBUG leads with 46.03% vs 28.81% for SPPP. On fees, GBUG is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SPPP has been the lower-risk option at 10.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GBUG or SPPP?

Over the 1-year period, GBUG has performed better with a 46.03% return vs 28.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBUG or SPPP?

GBUG is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for SPPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBUG or SPPP?

GBUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for SPPP.

What is the main difference between GBUG and SPPP?

GBUG is categorized as Gold, while SPPP is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for GBUG and 1.02% for SPPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.