GBTC vs. ZCSH
GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - GBTC tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index while ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GBTC returned 53.36%/yr vs 171.44%/yr for ZCSH. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBTC charges 1.50%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
GBTC vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -27.82% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 19.47% return.
GBTC
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -22.25%
- YTD
- -27.82%
- 6M
- -31.83%
- 1Y
- -40.35%
- 3Y*
- 53.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 49.21%
ZCSH
- 1D
- -15.46%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 43.36%
- 1Y
- 855.73%
- 3Y*
- 171.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBTC vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.82% | -7.65% | 113.81% | 317.61% | -75.80% | -24.97% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 19.47% | 446.78% | 96.92% | 65.91% | -86.30% | -48.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBTC and ZCSH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBTC vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
GBTC
ZCSH
GBTC vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBTC | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.46 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 12.42 | -13.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 24.28 | -25.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBTC | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | 5.18 | -6.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.07 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
GBTC vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBTC | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.91% | -93.73% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.87% | -69.62% | +19.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.87% | -71.90% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.87% | -28.74% | -21.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -74.37% | +30.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.81% | 35.53% | -6.72% |
Volatility
GBTC vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) is 9.07%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 50.94%. This indicates that GBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBTC | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 50.94% | -41.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.86% | 95.34% | -61.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.69% | 166.88% | -123.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.44% | 137.01% | -74.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.20% | 137.01% | -54.81% |
GBTC vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBTC vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
Neither GBTC nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.61% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBTC and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZCSH has higher volatility (50.94%) compared to GBTC (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs ZCSH's -93.73%.
On 3-year performance, ZCSH leads with 171.44% vs 53.36% for GBTC. On fees, GBTC is cheaper at 1.50% per year. On volatility, GBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 171.44% return vs 53.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBTC is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
GBTC and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBTC and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer