PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBTC vs. EZET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBTC vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -32.86% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -47.61% return.


GBTC

1D
-1.10%
1M
-22.12%
YTD
-32.86%
6M
-32.70%
1Y
-45.93%
3Y*
36.17%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
44.37%

EZET

1D
-1.69%
1M
-24.76%
YTD
-47.61%
6M
-46.98%
1Y
-36.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBTC vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-32.86%-7.65%22.23%
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
-47.61%-11.23%-4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GBTC and EZET is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.82

The correlation between GBTC and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBTC vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

EZET
EZET Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBTC vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBTCEZETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.95

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.53

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

-0.89

-0.59

GBTC vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBTC and EZET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBTC vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, which is greater than EZET's maximum drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and EZET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBTCEZETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.91%

-67.89%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.37%

-67.89%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.37%

-67.89%

+14.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.45%

-33.78%

-9.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.15%

40.85%

-9.70%

Volatility

GBTC vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) is 13.27%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 19.96%. This indicates that GBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBTCEZETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.27%

19.96%

-6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.52%

46.50%

-11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.31%

68.96%

-24.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.02%

72.42%

-10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.44%

72.42%

+9.02%

GBTC vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBTC vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBTC nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBTC and EZET have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZET has higher volatility (19.96%) compared to GBTC (13.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs EZET's -67.89%.

On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -36.13% vs -45.93% for GBTC. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, GBTC has been the lower-risk option at 13.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -36.13% return vs -45.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

GBTC and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 0.19% for EZET.

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBTC and EZET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer