PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPUSD=X vs. IEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBPUSD=X vs. IEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GBPUSD=X having a -0.45% return and IEF slightly lower at -0.47%. Over the past 10 years, GBPUSD=X has underperformed IEF with an annualized return of -0.52%, while IEF has yielded a comparatively higher 0.59% annualized return.


GBPUSD=X

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.22%
1Y
-1.60%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*
-0.52%

IEF

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.19%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
0.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPUSD=X vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBPUSD=X
GBP/USD
-0.45%7.55%-1.67%5.28%-10.69%-0.91%3.06%4.01%-5.66%9.52%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.47%8.03%-0.63%3.64%-15.15%-3.33%10.01%8.03%0.99%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPUSD=X and IEF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.02

Over the past year, GBPUSD=X and IEF have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPUSD=X vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPUSD=X
GBPUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPUSD=X vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBPUSD=XIEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.12

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

0.84

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

2.35

-2.82

GBPUSD=X vs. IEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPUSD=X Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the IEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPUSD=X and IEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBPUSD=X vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPUSD=X drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, which is greater than IEF's maximum drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPUSD=X and IEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPUSD=XIEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.29%

-23.93%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-4.07%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-7.74%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-21.40%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.99%

-23.93%

-4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.44%

-11.18%

-25.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.18%

-5.35%

-25.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.45%

+1.11%

Volatility

GBPUSD=X vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GBP/USD (GBPUSD=X) is 1.22%, while iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that GBPUSD=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPUSD=XIEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.62%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.96%

3.42%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.25%

4.72%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.24%

7.71%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.09%

6.63%

+2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPUSD=X and IEF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEF has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to GBPUSD=X (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBPUSD=X dropped -49.29% vs IEF's -23.93%.

IEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPUSD=X and IEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer