GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L
GBP5.L (L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF) and BCOG.L (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBP5.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while BCOG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBP5.L returned 2.30%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for BCOG.L. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. GBP5.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BCOG.L.
Performance
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBP5.L achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than BCOG.L's 24.98% return.
GBP5.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BCOG.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 24.98%
- 6M
- 21.68%
- 1Y
- 37.95%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- —
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBP5.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | 0.88% | 6.37% | 4.55% | 6.90% | -6.01% | -0.54% |
BCOG.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 24.98% | 8.16% | 6.13% | -12.32% | 29.36% | 21.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBP5.L and BCOG.L is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021 | -0.13 |
The correlation between GBP5.L and BCOG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBP5.L
BCOG.L
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBP5.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 4.43 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 10.23 | -1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBP5.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.05 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.74 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.49 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBP5.L drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, smaller than the maximum BCOG.L drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBP5.L and BCOG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBP5.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -28.15% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -8.57% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.82% | -14.48% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.97% | -27.76% | +15.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -5.16% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -11.67% | +9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 3.72% | -3.20% |
Volatility
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L) is 1.86%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that GBP5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBP5.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.86% | 6.06% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 15.89% | -12.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 18.51% | -14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 16.89% | -13.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 15.71% | -12.23% |
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBP5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GBP5.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison
GBP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while BCOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCOG.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBP5.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | 4.58% | 4.40% | 3.78% | 2.56% | 1.05% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBP5.L and BCOG.L have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBP5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBP5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BCOG.L.
GBP5.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while BCOG.L is Commodities. GBP5.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while BCOG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GBP5.L and 0.15% for BCOG.L.
Find the right allocation for GBP5.L and BCOG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer