GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L
GBP5.L (L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF) and AUCP.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBP5.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while AUCP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the STOXX Global Gold Miners. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBP5.L returned 2.30%/yr vs 21.82%/yr for AUCP.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBP5.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AUCP.L.
Performance
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBP5.L achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than AUCP.L's -7.43% return.
GBP5.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
AUCP.L
- 1D
- -6.90%
- 1M
- -12.67%
- YTD
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -2.88%
- 1Y
- 53.56%
- 3Y*
- 43.06%
- 5Y*
- 21.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBP5.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | 0.85% | 6.37% | 4.55% | 6.90% | -6.01% | -0.82% | 0.42% |
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -7.43% | 161.99% | 20.20% | 8.69% | -4.04% | -8.91% | 1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBP5.L and AUCP.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2020 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBP5.L
AUCP.L
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBP5.L | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 1.73 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 4.58 | +4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBP5.L | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.20 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.56 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.13 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBP5.L drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, smaller than the maximum AUCP.L drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBP5.L and AUCP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBP5.L | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -81.66% | +69.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -30.79% | +28.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.82% | -30.79% | +28.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.97% | -39.38% | +27.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -30.79% | +30.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -45.91% | +43.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 11.67% | -11.15% |
Volatility
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L) is 1.81%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that GBP5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBP5.L | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 14.23% | -12.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 34.59% | -31.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 44.51% | -40.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 38.81% | -35.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 36.12% | -32.78% |
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBP5.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCP.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBP5.L vs. AUCP.L - Dividend Comparison
GBP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while AUCP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBP5.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF | 4.58% | 4.40% | 3.78% | 2.56% | 1.05% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBP5.L and AUCP.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBP5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBP5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCP.L.
GBP5.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while AUCP.L is Precious Metals. GBP5.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while AUCP.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GBP5.L and 0.55% for AUCP.L.
Find the right allocation for GBP5.L and AUCP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer