GBIO vs. CEFS
GBIO (Generation Bio Co.) is a stock, while CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) is Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GBIO vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GBIO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEFS
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- —
GBIO vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIO Generation Bio Co. | -5.99% | -46.42% | -35.76% | -58.02% | -44.49% | -75.03% | 14.82% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 11.63% | 16.67% | 23.48% | 20.99% | -7.08% | 17.86% | 17.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBIO and CEFS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2020 | 0.24 |
The correlation between GBIO and CEFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBIO vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank
GBIO
CEFS
GBIO vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Generation Bio Co. (GBIO) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBIO | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.78 | — |
Drawdowns
GBIO vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBIO | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -38.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.37% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.46% | — |
Volatility
GBIO vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBIO | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.21% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.12% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.35% | — |
Dividends
GBIO vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison
GBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.23% | 7.84% | 8.79% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 8.10% | 10.43% | 5.02% |
GBIO Generation Bio Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBIO and CEFS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GBIO and CEFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer