GBIAX vs. NWJJX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) and Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX).
GBIAX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Dec 29, 1999. NWJJX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Feb 15, 1984.
Performance
GBIAX vs. NWJJX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GBIAX vs. NWJJX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | -0.40% | 6.54% | 0.44% | 5.03% | -14.06% | -2.38% | 6.60% | 8.08% | -0.74% | 2.89% |
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | -0.39% | 6.71% | 1.86% | 5.28% | -13.82% | -1.55% | 8.26% | 9.58% | -0.67% | 3.14% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GBIAX having a -0.40% return and NWJJX slightly higher at -0.39%. Over the past 10 years, GBIAX has underperformed NWJJX with an annualized return of 0.91%, while NWJJX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.69% annualized return.
GBIAX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
NWJJX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBIAX vs. NWJJX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBIAX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NWJJX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GBIAX vs. NWJJX — Risk / Return Rank
GBIAX
NWJJX
GBIAX vs. NWJJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) and Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBIAX | NWJJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.81 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.48 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 4.11 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBIAX | NWJJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.81 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | -0.01 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.35 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.47 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between GBIAX and NWJJX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GBIAX vs. NWJJX - Dividend Comparison
GBIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than NWJJX's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | 2.97% | 3.18% | 3.07% | 2.57% | 1.59% | 3.02% | 1.79% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 1.93% | 2.15% | 2.43% |
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.10% | 3.09% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 5.17% | 3.30% | 2.60% | 2.16% | 3.12% | 2.42% |
Drawdowns
GBIAX vs. NWJJX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.26%, which is greater than NWJJX's maximum drawdown of -18.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIAX and NWJJX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBIAX | NWJJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.26% | -18.99% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.79% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.07% | -18.78% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.26% | -18.99% | -1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.78% | -3.45% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.02% | -4.11% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 1.00% | -0.01% |
Volatility
GBIAX vs. NWJJX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) and Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GBIAX | NWJJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.54% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 2.58% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 4.40% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 5.82% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 4.84% | +0.10% |