GBF vs. FIGB
GBF (iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF) and FIGB (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. GBF is passively managed, while FIGB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBF returned -0.19%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for FIGB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GBF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FIGB.
Performance
GBF vs. FIGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBF achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than FIGB's 0.14% return.
GBF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
FIGB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
GBF vs. FIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBF iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | 0.35% | 6.41% | 0.99% | 5.79% | -13.85% | 1.86% |
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 0.14% | 6.95% | 1.51% | 6.65% | -13.43% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBF and FIGB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GBF and FIGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBF vs. FIGB — Risk / Return Rank
GBF
FIGB
GBF vs. FIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBF | FIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 4.50 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBF | FIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.04 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.04 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.07 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
GBF vs. FIGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBF drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, which is greater than FIGB's maximum drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBF and FIGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBF | FIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -18.08% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.93% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.78% | -6.17% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.45% | -18.08% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -1.60% | -3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -6.92% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.95% | -0.03% |
Volatility
GBF vs. FIGB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) is 1.21%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that GBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBF | FIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 1.42% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 2.87% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 4.16% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 6.28% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 6.16% | -0.88% |
GBF vs. FIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FIGB's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBF vs. FIGB - Dividend Comparison
GBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than FIGB's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.15% | 4.28% | 3.79% | 2.44% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBF iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.78% | 3.81% | 3.94% | 3.03% | 2.13% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 2.64% | 2.59% | 2.31% | 2.09% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBF and FIGB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIGB has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to GBF (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBF dropped -19.67% vs FIGB's -18.08%.
On 5-year performance, FIGB leads with 0.24% vs -0.19% for GBF. On fees, GBF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GBF has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIGB has performed better with a 0.24% return vs -0.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FIGB.
FIGB has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 3.78% for GBF.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GBF and 0.36% for FIGB.
GBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBF and FIGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer