GBF vs. NUBD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD).
GBF and NUBD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. NUBD is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Aggregate ESG Select Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2017. Both GBF and NUBD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GBF or NUBD.
Correlation
The correlation between GBF and NUBD is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GBF vs. NUBD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GBF:
1.23
NUBD:
1.27
GBF:
1.80
NUBD:
1.90
GBF:
1.21
NUBD:
1.22
GBF:
0.43
NUBD:
0.44
GBF:
2.98
NUBD:
3.00
GBF:
2.12%
NUBD:
2.12%
GBF:
5.14%
NUBD:
5.00%
GBF:
-19.67%
NUBD:
-19.45%
GBF:
-8.96%
NUBD:
-8.63%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBF achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than NUBD's 1.72% return.
GBF
2.01%
0.01%
-0.16%
6.55%
-1.16%
1.25%
NUBD
1.72%
-0.20%
-0.29%
6.67%
-1.28%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBF vs. NUBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than NUBD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GBF vs. NUBD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GBF
NUBD
GBF vs. NUBD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GBF vs. NUBD - Dividend Comparison
GBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than NUBD's 3.65% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBF iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.88% | 3.94% | 3.03% | 2.13% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 2.64% | 2.59% | 2.31% | 2.09% | 2.04% | 2.08% |
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.65% | 3.51% | 2.99% | 2.83% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.67% | 3.08% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GBF vs. NUBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBF drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, roughly equal to the maximum NUBD drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBF and NUBD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GBF vs. NUBD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) at 1.78%. This indicates that GBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.