PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBF vs. NUBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBF vs. NUBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBF vs. NUBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBF
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF
0.09%6.41%0.99%5.79%-13.85%-2.30%8.76%9.47%-0.52%0.49%
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.01%6.75%1.31%5.42%-12.90%-2.19%7.17%8.22%0.32%0.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBF achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than NUBD's -0.01% return.


GBF

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.44%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
1.58%

NUBD

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GBF vs. NUBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than NUBD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GBF vs. NUBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBF
GBF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBF Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

NUBD
NUBD Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NUBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUBD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NUBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBF vs. NUBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBFNUBDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.94

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.34

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.65

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.29

4.48

-0.18

GBF vs. NUBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the NUBD Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBF and NUBD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBFNUBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.94

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.01

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.29

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between GBF and NUBD is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GBF vs. NUBD - Dividend Comparison

GBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than NUBD's 3.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBF
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF
3.77%3.81%3.94%3.03%2.13%1.22%1.64%2.64%2.59%2.31%2.09%2.04%
NUBD
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.92%3.90%3.51%2.99%2.83%2.05%2.21%2.66%3.08%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GBF vs. NUBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBF drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, roughly equal to the maximum NUBD drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBF and NUBD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBFNUBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-19.45%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-2.50%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.45%

-17.90%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-4.13%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-6.10%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.92%

-0.03%

Volatility

GBF vs. NUBD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) have volatilities of 1.64% and 1.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBFNUBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

1.59%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

2.49%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

4.13%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.92%

5.97%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

5.14%

+0.13%