GBCI vs. TCBX
GBCI (Glacier Bancorp, Inc.) and TCBX (Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, GBCI returned 15.20%/yr vs 31.48%/yr for TCBX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GBCI vs. TCBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBCI achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than TCBX's 3.16% return.
GBCI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 16.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- -1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
TCBX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 31.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBCI vs. TCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBCI Glacier Bancorp, Inc. | 7.80% | -9.59% | 25.37% | -13.01% | -10.40% | -2.80% |
TCBX Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. | 3.16% | 11.96% | 70.86% | 7.81% | -29.06% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBCI and TCBX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between GBCI and TCBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
GBCI:
$2.99
TCBX:
$5.38
GBCI:
15.79
TCBX:
7.29
GBCI:
2.86
TCBX:
1.32
GBCI:
$1.47B
TCBX:
$380.73M
GBCI:
$773.98M
TCBX:
$157.61M
GBCI:
$290.75M
TCBX:
$71.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBCI vs. TCBX — Risk / Return Rank
GBCI
TCBX
GBCI vs. TCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) and Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBCI | TCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.19 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 1.82 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 3.74 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBCI | TCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 1.01 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
GBCI vs. TCBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBCI drawdown since its inception was -63.24%, which is greater than TCBX's maximum drawdown of -54.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBCI and TCBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBCI | TCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.24% | -54.53% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.56% | -16.06% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.79% | -30.07% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.93% | -9.78% | -7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -21.63% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.61% | 7.80% | +1.81% |
Volatility
GBCI vs. TCBX - Volatility Comparison
Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) and Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) have volatilities of 7.55% and 7.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBCI | TCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 7.21% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 20.16% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.12% | 28.88% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.14% | 33.40% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.12% | 33.40% | +1.72% |
Dividends
GBCI vs. TCBX - Dividend Comparison
GBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while TCBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBCI Glacier Bancorp, Inc. | 2.80% | 3.00% | 2.63% | 3.19% | 2.87% | 2.50% | 3.00% | 3.07% | 2.55% | 3.66% | 3.04% | 3.96% |
TCBX Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GBCI vs. TCBX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glacier Bancorp, Inc. and Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GBCI vs. TCBX - Profitability Comparison
GBCI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 362.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TCBX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 97.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GBCI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 362.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TCBX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 97.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GBCI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 82.14M and revenue of 362.34M, resulting in a net margin of 22.7%.
TCBX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. reported a net income of 16.37M and revenue of 97.39M, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GBCI and TCBX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBCI has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to TCBX (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBCI dropped -63.24% vs TCBX's -54.53%.
TCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBCI and TCBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer