GBCI vs. RF
GBCI (Glacier Bancorp, Inc.) and RF (Regions Financial Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, GBCI returned 9.67%/yr vs 17.63%/yr for RF. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GBCI vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBCI achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 16.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GBCI has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 9.67%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.63% annualized return.
GBCI
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 18.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.97%
RF
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 17.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.71M | $61.39M | $56.33M | |
| $297.55M | $312.28M | $316.23M |
GBCI vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBCI Glacier Bancorp, Inc. | 13.41% | -9.59% | 25.37% | -13.01% | -10.40% | 26.45% | 3.83% | 20.08% | 3.07% | 13.20% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 16.41% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBCI and RF is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 1992 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, GBCI and RF have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GBCI:
$6.41B
RF:
$26.41B
GBCI:
$1.41
RF:
$2.55
GBCI:
34.99
RF:
12.13
GBCI:
3.28
RF:
2.83
GBCI:
$1.40B
RF:
$9.57B
GBCI:
$559.59M
RF:
$7.35B
GBCI:
$507.73M
RF:
$2.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBCI vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank
GBCI
RF
GBCI vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBCI | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.47 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 3.51 | -1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBCI vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBCI drawdown since its inception was -63.24%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBCI and RF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBCI | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.24% | -92.65% | +29.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.56% | -18.45% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.79% | -32.35% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.50% | -40.99% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.50% | -60.73% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.61% | -4.48% | -8.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.01% | -30.96% | +11.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 7.74% | +2.02% |
Volatility
GBCI vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) has a higher volatility of 7.90% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 6.85%. This indicates that GBCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBCI | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | 6.85% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 17.66% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.21% | 24.26% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.92% | 31.12% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 35.64% | -0.58% |
Dividends
GBCI vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
GBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than RF's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBCI Glacier Bancorp, Inc. | 2.68% | 3.00% | 2.63% | 3.19% | 2.87% | 2.50% | 3.00% | 3.07% | 2.55% | 3.66% | 3.04% | 3.96% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.42% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Financials
GBCI vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glacier Bancorp, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GBCI and RF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBCI has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to RF (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBCI dropped -63.24% vs RF's -92.65%.
RF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBCI and RF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer