GBCI vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GBCI or RF.
Correlation
The correlation between GBCI and RF is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GBCI vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GBCI:
0.41
RF:
0.52
GBCI:
0.90
RF:
1.02
GBCI:
1.11
RF:
1.14
GBCI:
0.38
RF:
0.55
GBCI:
1.08
RF:
1.46
GBCI:
14.67%
RF:
12.08%
GBCI:
36.10%
RF:
30.73%
GBCI:
-63.74%
RF:
-92.65%
GBCI:
-25.60%
RF:
-16.60%
Fundamentals
GBCI:
$4.92B
RF:
$20.17B
GBCI:
$1.87
RF:
$2.07
GBCI:
23.20
RF:
10.84
GBCI:
2.10
RF:
2.90
GBCI:
5.95
RF:
3.03
GBCI:
1.52
RF:
1.20
GBCI:
$1.03B
RF:
$9.40B
GBCI:
$706.36M
RF:
$6.66B
GBCI:
$200.77M
RF:
$2.63B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBCI achieves a -12.70% return, which is significantly lower than RF's -3.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GBCI has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 8.23%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.02% annualized return.
GBCI
-12.70%
10.70%
-21.63%
14.75%
7.30%
8.23%
RF
-3.49%
15.59%
-12.79%
15.76%
24.64%
12.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GBCI vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GBCI
RF
GBCI vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GBCI vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
GBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than RF's 4.41% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBCI Glacier Bancorp, Inc. | 3.04% | 2.63% | 3.19% | 2.87% | 2.50% | 3.00% | 3.07% | 2.55% | 3.66% | 3.04% | 3.96% | 2.45% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.41% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
GBCI vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBCI drawdown since its inception was -63.74%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBCI and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
GBCI vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 7.97%. This indicates that GBCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
GBCI vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glacier Bancorp, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GBCI vs. RF - Profitability Comparison
GBCI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of -105.62M and revenue of 216.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -48.7%.
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 2.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.
GBCI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 63.49M and revenue of 216.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 621.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
GBCI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Glacier Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 54.57M and revenue of 216.88M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 490.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.