GBAT vs. EZPZ
GBAT (Grayscale Basic Attention Token Trust) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. GBAT is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Over the past year, GBAT returned -49.06% vs -43.90% for EZPZ. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GBAT vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBAT achieves a -63.16% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -33.92% return.
GBAT
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -27.03%
- YTD
- -63.16%
- 6M
- -63.28%
- 1Y
- -49.06%
- 3Y*
- -32.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -18.14%
- YTD
- -33.92%
- 6M
- -33.73%
- 1Y
- -43.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBAT vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GBAT Grayscale Basic Attention Token Trust | -63.16% | -57.82% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -33.92% | -10.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBAT and EZPZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBAT vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
GBAT
EZPZ
GBAT vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Basic Attention Token Trust (GBAT) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBAT | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.85 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.78 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.31 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBAT vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBAT drawdown since its inception was -98.13%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAT and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBAT | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.13% | -56.49% | -41.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.53% | -56.49% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.68% | -55.44% | -42.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.04% | -23.26% | -45.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.29% | 33.50% | +13.79% |
Volatility
GBAT vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Basic Attention Token Trust (GBAT) has a higher volatility of 31.49% compared to Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) at 14.87%. This indicates that GBAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBAT | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.49% | 14.87% | +16.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.98% | 37.14% | +35.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.10% | 47.88% | +84.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.39% | 47.75% | +121.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.39% | 47.75% | +121.64% |
Dividends
GBAT vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GBAT nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GBAT and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBAT has higher volatility (31.49%) compared to EZPZ (14.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBAT dropped -98.13% vs EZPZ's -56.49%.
On 1-year performance, EZPZ leads with -43.90% vs -49.06% for GBAT. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EZPZ has performed better with a -43.90% return vs -49.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBAT and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton.
GBAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBAT and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer