PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAUG vs. IVVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GAUG vs. IVVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GAUG vs. IVVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August
-1.41%11.28%11.78%5.84%
IVVM
iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF
-1.95%14.24%16.08%5.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAUG achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly higher than IVVM's -1.95% return.


GAUG

1D
1.62%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
0.25%
1Y
11.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVVM

1D
2.22%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
0.42%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GAUG vs. IVVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GAUG vs. IVVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAUG
GAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVM
IVVM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IVVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAUG vs. IVVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAUGIVVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.96

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

1.48

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.38

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.23

7.89

+1.34

GAUG vs. IVVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the IVVM Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAUG and IVVM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAUGIVVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.96

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between GAUG and IVVM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GAUG vs. IVVM - Dividend Comparison

GAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


Drawdowns

GAUG vs. IVVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAUG drawdown since its inception was -10.08%, smaller than the maximum IVVM drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUG and IVVM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GAUGIVVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-11.62%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-9.29%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-3.21%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-0.96%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.63%

-0.36%

Volatility

GAUG vs. IVVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - August (GAUG) is 2.99%, while iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that GAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GAUGIVVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.76%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

6.03%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

12.91%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

9.83%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.69%

9.83%

-2.14%