GAUD vs. SCHD
GAUD (Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both Dividend funds. GAUD is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAUD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
GAUD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAUD achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 21.95% return.
GAUD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- YTD
- 21.95%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
GAUD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAUD Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF | -0.92% | -1.12% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 21.95% | -0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAUD and SCHD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAUD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
GAUD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD
GAUD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF (GAUD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAUD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAUD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAUD drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAUD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -33.37% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -0.39% | -3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -3.30% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
GAUD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAUD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.30% | 11.05% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 14.39% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 16.71% | -5.41% |
GAUD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAUD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAUD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
GAUD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAUD Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAUD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GAUD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.61% for GAUD.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAUD and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for GAUD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer