GAUD vs. HIGH
GAUD (Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAUD is a Dividend fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAUD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HIGH.
Performance
GAUD vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAUD achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.98% return.
GAUD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIGH
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- -3.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAUD vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAUD Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF | -0.92% | -1.12% |
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | -0.98% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAUD and HIGH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAUD vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank
GAUD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HIGH
GAUD vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF (GAUD) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAUD | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.92 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAUD vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAUD drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, roughly equal to the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAUD and HIGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAUD | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -9.50% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -7.68% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -2.53% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.36% | — |
Volatility
GAUD vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAUD | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.30% | 7.26% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 9.48% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 9.48% | +1.82% |
GAUD vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAUD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HIGH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAUD vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison
GAUD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAUD Guinness Atkinson US Dividend Builder ETF | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | 7.13% | 7.71% | 8.34% | 9.40% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAUD and HIGH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAUD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAUD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.
HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 0.61% for GAUD.
GAUD is categorized as Dividend, while HIGH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GAUD and 0.50% for HIGH.
Find the right allocation for GAUD and HIGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer