GARP vs. VFQY
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. GARP is passively managed, while VFQY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 17.48%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for VFQY. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFQY.
Performance
GARP vs. VFQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than VFQY's 13.01% return.
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
VFQY
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $877.35K | $995.36K | $1.05M |
GARP vs. VFQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 13.01% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 22.48% | -15.74% | 27.96% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and VFQY is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between GARP and VFQY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GARP vs. VFQY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
VFQY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
VFQY
Communication Services
GARP
VFQY
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
VFQY
Financial Services
GARP
VFQY
Industrials
GARP
VFQY
Healthcare
GARP
VFQY
Energy
GARP
VFQY
Utilities
GARP
VFQY
-
Basic Materials
GARP
VFQY
Real Estate
GARP
VFQY
-
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
VFQY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. VFQY — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
VFQY
GARP vs. VFQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARP | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.26 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 8.53 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARP vs. VFQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum VFQY drawdown of -37.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and VFQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -37.41% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -9.12% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -20.67% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -25.93% | -4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -0.61% | -3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -6.57% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 2.41% | +1.34% |
Volatility
GARP vs. VFQY - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) at 2.96%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 2.96% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 9.55% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 13.41% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 18.28% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 20.73% | +3.19% |
GARP vs. VFQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VFQY's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GARP vs. VFQY - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than VFQY's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.04% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and VFQY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to VFQY (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs VFQY's -37.41%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 8.92% for VFQY. On fees, VFQY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFQY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.
VFQY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.13% for VFQY.
VFQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and VFQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer