PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -18.72% return.


GARP

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.22%
6M
14.45%
YTD
16.89%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.07%

SLV

1D
-2.13%
1M
-4.83%
6M
-30.59%
YTD
-18.72%
1Y
55.88%
3Y*
32.93%
5Y*
17.25%
10Y*
10.33%
ALL TIME*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.65M$25.43M$23.00M
$716.70M$772.79M$1.26B

GARP vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.89%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-18.72%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%46.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and SLV is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.22

The correlation between GARP and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GARP vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.10

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

2.10

+5.89

GARP vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-76.28%

+44.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-52.28%

+38.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-52.28%

+28.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-52.28%

+21.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-50.42%

+46.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-44.68%

+37.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

27.31%

-23.56%

Volatility

GARP vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) is 5.68%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that GARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

11.23%

-5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

55.44%

-39.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

61.35%

-41.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

36.97%

-14.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

32.22%

-8.30%

GARP vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARP vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and SLV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to GARP (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 17.25% for SLV. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 17.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

GARP is categorized as Quality Factor, while SLV is Silver. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.50% for SLV.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer