PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. QGRPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than QGRPX's 4.11% return.


GARP

1D
-0.72%
1M
11.92%
YTD
21.29%
6M
21.80%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
33.60%
5Y*
20.26%
10Y*

QGRPX

1D
-0.61%
1M
5.18%
YTD
4.11%
6M
3.50%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
21.29%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%18.94%
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
4.11%15.51%25.13%35.52%-25.57%29.14%14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and QGRPX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.90

The correlation between GARP and QGRPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRPX
QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GARPQGRPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

1.16

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

3.68

+9.16

GARP vs. QGRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the QGRPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and QGRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GARPQGRPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.39

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.65

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.78

+0.12

Drawdowns

GARP vs. QGRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum QGRPX drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QGRPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPQGRPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-30.28%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-17.45%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-21.03%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-30.28%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.61%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-7.56%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

5.29%

-1.89%

Volatility

GARP vs. QGRPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) at 3.16%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPQGRPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

3.16%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

11.75%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

14.54%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

19.60%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

19.29%

+4.60%

GARP vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GARP vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than QGRPX's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
5.92%6.16%3.62%0.42%1.00%2.84%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and QGRPX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to QGRPX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QGRPX's -30.28%.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and QGRPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer