GARP vs. QGRPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX).

GARP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2020. QGRPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020.

Performance

GARP vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GARP vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF	-6.01%	21.49%	37.42%	42.86%	-26.75%	27.99%	18.94%
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	-14.31%	15.51%	25.13%	35.52%	-25.57%	29.14%	14.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly higher than QGRPX's -14.31% return.

GARP

• 1D: 3.86%
• 1M: -5.81%
• YTD: -6.01%
• 6M: -2.39%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 25.22%
• 5Y*: 15.18%
• 10Y*: —

QGRPX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -9.01%
• YTD: -14.31%
• 6M: -13.51%
• 1Y: 6.80%
• 3Y*: 15.45%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.

QGRPX

UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund

GARP

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF

Return for Risk

GARP vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP

GARP Risk / Return Rank: 69
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 72

QGRPX

QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 12
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GARP	QGRPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.37	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	0.69	+0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.09	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	0.09	+1.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	0.27	+6.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GARP vs. QGRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the QGRPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and QGRPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GARP	QGRPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	0.37	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.48	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.60	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and QGRPX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GARP vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than QGRPX's 7.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF	0.32%	0.31%	0.38%	0.75%	1.85%	0.67%	0.75%
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	7.19%	6.16%	3.62%	0.42%	1.00%	2.84%	0.37%

Drawdowns

GARP vs. QGRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum QGRPX drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QGRPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GARP	QGRPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-30.28%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.69%	-17.45%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.61%	-30.28%	-0.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.35%	-17.45%	+7.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-7.64%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	5.58%	-1.87%

Volatility

GARP vs. QGRPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) at 4.65%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GARP	QGRPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.52%	4.65%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	10.82%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.39%	20.87%	+3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.86%	19.54%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.02%	19.38%	+4.64%