GARP vs. QGRPX
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and QGRPX (UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 20.26%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for QGRPX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QGRPX.
Performance
GARP vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than QGRPX's 4.11% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRPX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- 1Y
- 17.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 18.94% |
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | 4.11% | 15.51% | 25.13% | 35.52% | -25.57% | 29.14% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and QGRPX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GARP and QGRPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
QGRPX
GARP vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.25 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.16 | +2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 3.68 | +9.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.39 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.65 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.78 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. QGRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum QGRPX drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and QGRPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -30.28% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -17.45% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -21.03% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -30.28% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.61% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -7.56% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 5.29% | -1.89% |
Volatility
GARP vs. QGRPX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) at 3.16%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | QGRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 3.16% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 11.75% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 14.54% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 19.60% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 19.29% | +4.60% |
GARP vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than QGRPX's 5.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | 5.92% | 6.16% | 3.62% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 2.84% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and QGRPX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to QGRPX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs QGRPX's -30.28%.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and QGRPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer