PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 9.21% return.


GARP

1D
-2.76%
1M
0.95%
YTD
16.17%
6M
14.60%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*

ILCG

1D
-2.86%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
9.21%
6M
7.82%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
18.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.17%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
9.21%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%33.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and ILCG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.93

The correlation between GARP and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

GARP vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GARP
ILCG

Technology

55.8%
53.1%

Communication Services

11.4%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
10.1%

Financial Services

7.2%
5.5%

Industrials

6.6%
7.7%

Healthcare

5.3%
5.2%

Energy

2.8%
0.4%

Utilities

1.2%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Technology

GARP
55.8%
ILCG
53.1%

Communication Services

GARP
11.4%
ILCG
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GARP
8.5%
ILCG
10.1%

Financial Services

GARP
7.2%
ILCG
5.5%

Industrials

GARP
6.6%
ILCG
7.7%

Healthcare

GARP
5.3%
ILCG
5.2%

Energy

GARP
2.8%
ILCG
0.4%

Utilities

GARP
1.2%
ILCG
0.7%

Basic Materials

GARP
1.1%
ILCG
1.0%

Real Estate

GARP
0.4%
ILCG
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

GARP

-

ILCG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.41

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

4.86

+5.53

GARP vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-52.98%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-15.65%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-23.10%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-35.38%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-5.58%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-8.21%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

4.54%

-1.02%

Volatility

GARP vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) at 7.83%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

7.83%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.52%

14.51%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.23%

17.70%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

22.22%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.98%

21.63%

+2.35%

GARP vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GARP vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than ILCG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GARP and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GARP has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to ILCG (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 18.36% vs 12.71% for ILCG. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCG has been the lower-risk option at 7.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.

ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.04% for ILCG.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer