GARP vs. DYNF
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares. GARP is passively managed, while DYNF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 18.96%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for DYNF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DYNF.
Performance
GARP vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than DYNF's 9.88% return.
GARP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 38.39%
- 3Y*
- 31.05%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.96% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 9.88% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and DYNF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GARP and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
GARP vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
DYNF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
DYNF
Communication Services
GARP
DYNF
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
DYNF
Financial Services
GARP
DYNF
Industrials
GARP
DYNF
Healthcare
GARP
DYNF
Energy
GARP
DYNF
Utilities
GARP
DYNF
Basic Materials
GARP
DYNF
Real Estate
GARP
DYNF
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
DYNF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
DYNF
GARP vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARP | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.15 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 14.77 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARP vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and DYNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -34.72% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -8.67% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -18.70% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -28.65% | -1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -2.06% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -5.96% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 1.85% | +1.64% |
Volatility
GARP vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) at 4.91%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 4.91% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 10.37% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 13.01% | +5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 17.58% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 19.91% | +4.04% |
GARP vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DYNF's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GARP vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than DYNF's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, GARP and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GARP has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to DYNF (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs DYNF's -34.72%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 18.96% vs 14.62% for DYNF. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 14.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.
DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.26% for GARP.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.26% for DYNF.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and DYNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer