GARP vs. ACWI
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 20.74%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
GARP vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 13.06% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
GARP vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 22.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 13.06% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 13.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and ACWI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between GARP and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
GARP vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
ACWI
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
ACWI
Communication Services
GARP
ACWI
Financial Services
GARP
ACWI
Industrials
GARP
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
ACWI
Healthcare
GARP
ACWI
Energy
GARP
ACWI
Utilities
GARP
ACWI
Basic Materials
GARP
ACWI
Real Estate
GARP
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
ACWI
GARP vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GARP | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.41 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 3.31 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.24 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | 14.58 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GARP | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.41 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.73 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.43 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
GARP vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -56.00% | +24.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -9.73% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -16.55% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -26.42% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -8.61% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.16% | +1.24% |
Volatility
GARP vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.88%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 3.88% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 10.27% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 12.77% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 16.05% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 17.11% | +6.79% |
GARP vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GARP vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than ACWI's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.37% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, GARP and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GARP has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to ACWI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.74% vs 11.67% for ACWI. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.32% for ACWI.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer