PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPR vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPR vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPR achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.21% return.


GAPR

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.03%
YTD
4.16%
6M
4.90%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.21%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
0.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPR vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GAPR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April
4.16%6.68%14.53%10.07%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.21%11.36%-2.18%-7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPR and TLTW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPR vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPR
GAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPR vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAPRTLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.24

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.94

1.76

+10.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

62.55

5.28

+57.27

GAPR vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPR and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAPRTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97

1.37

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

-0.03

+1.67

Drawdowns

GAPR vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPR drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPR and TLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPRTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-18.61%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.88%

-5.97%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.98%

-17.19%

+8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-3.20%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-8.25%

+7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

1.99%

-1.82%

Volatility

GAPR vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) is 0.93%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that GAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPRTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

2.48%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

5.79%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

7.70%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.03%

11.39%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

11.39%

-4.36%

GAPR vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPR vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

GAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GAPR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.76%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAPR and TLTW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTW has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to GAPR (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPR dropped -8.98% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

On 3-year performance, GAPR leads with 11.06% vs 0.74% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GAPR has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAPR.

TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 0.00% for GAPR.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAPR and 0.35% for TLTW.

GAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPR and TLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer