GAPR vs. GMAR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April) and GMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds from FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GAPR returned 11.11%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for GMAR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

GAPR vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPR achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than GMAR's 7.99% return.

GAPR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 6M: 5.20%
• 1Y: 10.64%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMAR

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 8.99%
• 1Y: 15.68%
• 3Y*: 12.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPR vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April	4.29%	6.68%	14.53%	10.07%
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	7.99%	9.29%	12.14%	9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GAPR and GMAR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2023	0.85

The correlation between GAPR and GMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAPR vs. GMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAPR	GMAR
Technology	35.9%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.9%
Communication Services	11.3%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	7.8%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.9%
Energy	3.6%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

GAPR vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPR

GAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
GAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

GMAR

GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPR vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAPR	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.06	4.04	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.05	6.76	+0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.97	2.05	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.64	8.85	+3.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	66.59	61.68	+4.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAPR vs. GMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.06, which is comparable to the GMAR Sharpe Ratio of 4.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPR and GMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAPR	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.06	4.04	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	1.92	-0.27

Drawdowns

GAPR vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPR drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, roughly equal to the maximum GMAR drawdown of -9.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPR and GMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAPR	GMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.98%	-9.11%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.88%	-1.79%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.98%	-9.11%	+0.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.01%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-0.54%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	0.26%	-0.09%

Volatility

GAPR vs. GMAR - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) at 0.71%. This indicates that GAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAPR	GMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	0.71%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.84%	2.98%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65%	3.90%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.03%	6.84%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.03%	6.84%	+0.19%

GAPR vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GAPR and GMAR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

GAPR vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither GAPR nor GMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAPR and GMAR in my portfolio?

GAPR and GMAR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAPR or GMAR?

GAPR has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to GMAR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPR dropped -8.98% vs GMAR's -9.11%.

Which ETF is better, GAPR or GMAR?

On 3-year performance, GMAR leads with 12.27% vs 11.11% for GAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, GMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAPR or GMAR?

Over the 3-year period, GMAR has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAPR or GMAR?

GAPR and GMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAPR or GMAR?

GAPR and GMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 4.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.