GAPR vs. PMDE
GAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April) and PMDE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December) are both exchange-traded funds - GAPR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while PMDE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). GAPR is actively managed, while PMDE is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMDE.
Performance
GAPR vs. PMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAPR achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than PMDE's 3.16% return.
GAPR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 9.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMDE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAPR vs. PMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 4.68% | 0.83% |
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December | 3.16% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAPR and PMDE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAPR vs. PMDE — Risk / Return Rank
GAPR
PMDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GAPR vs. PMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAPR | PMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAPR vs. PMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAPR drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, which is greater than PMDE's maximum drawdown of -1.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPR and PMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAPR | PMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -1.59% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -0.24% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | — | — |
Volatility
GAPR vs. PMDE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAPR | PMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 2.39% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.01% | 2.39% | +4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.01% | 2.39% | +4.62% |
GAPR vs. PMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PMDE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAPR vs. PMDE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAPR nor PMDE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GAPR and PMDE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAPR.
GAPR and PMDE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while PMDE is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAPR and 0.50% for PMDE.
Find the right allocation for GAPR and PMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer