PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPR vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPR vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPR achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 15.17% return.


GAPR

1D
0.25%
1M
1.07%
6M
4.45%
YTD
4.68%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
10Y*

NVII

1D
3.77%
1M
4.97%
6M
15.03%
YTD
15.17%
1Y
37.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPR vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GAPR and NVII is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

0.51

The correlation between GAPR and NVII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPR vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPR
GAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPR vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAPRNVIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.19

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

2.01

+3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.78

4.39

+28.39

GAPR vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPR and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAPR vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPR drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum NVII drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPR and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPRNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-18.56%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.69%

-18.56%

+16.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-8.80%

+8.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-6.21%

+5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

8.47%

-8.19%

Volatility

GAPR vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) is 1.59%, while REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that GAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPRNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

10.97%

-9.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

27.86%

-25.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

36.38%

-33.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.01%

35.59%

-28.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.01%

35.59%

-28.58%

GAPR vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPR vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

GAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAPR and NVII have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to GAPR (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPR dropped -8.98% vs NVII's -18.56%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 37.08% vs 9.11% for GAPR. On fees, GAPR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 37.08% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GAPR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 55.39%, compared with 0.00% for GAPR.

GAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAPR and 0.99% for NVII.

GAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPR and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer