PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAPR vs. LAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAPR vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAPR achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than LAPR's 3.32% return.


GAPR

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.03%
YTD
4.16%
6M
4.90%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
10Y*

LAPR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.77%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAPR vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GAPR and LAPR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.69

The correlation between GAPR and LAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAPR vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAPR
GAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAPR vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAPRLAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

2.93

-0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.94

29.36

-17.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

62.55

144.96

-82.41

GAPR vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is comparable to the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 5.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAPR and LAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAPRLAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97

5.58

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

1.97

-0.33

Drawdowns

GAPR vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAPR drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPR and LAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPRLAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-3.81%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.88%

-0.24%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.12%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-0.11%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

0.05%

+0.12%

Volatility

GAPR vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April (GAPR) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that GAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPRLAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.32%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

1.00%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

1.27%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.03%

3.30%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

3.30%

+3.73%

GAPR vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAPR vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

GAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAPR and LAPR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAPR has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAPR dropped -8.98% vs LAPR's -3.81%.

On 1-year performance, GAPR leads with 10.42% vs 7.01% for LAPR. On fees, LAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GAPR has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GAPR.

LAPR has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 0.00% for GAPR.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GAPR and 0.79% for LAPR.

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 3.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAPR and LAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer