GAPAX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
GAPAX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 2, 1998. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
GAPAX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAPAX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPAX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A | -5.21% | 21.27% | 24.08% | 20.25% | -19.30% | 20.10% | 13.19% | 31.33% | -11.39% | 25.97% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAPAX achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPAX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
GAPAX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 16.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAPAX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAPAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAPAX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
GAPAX
CSUAX
GAPAX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAPAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.63 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.17 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.36 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 10.32 | -5.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAPAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.63 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.55 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAPAX and CSUAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAPAX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
GAPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.24%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPAX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A | 15.24% | 14.45% | 14.69% | 5.01% | 6.35% | 12.40% | 2.34% | 9.86% | 2.64% | 1.96% | 1.16% | 0.97% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
GAPAX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAPAX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPAX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAPAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.88% | -52.20% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | -7.98% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.13% | -20.45% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -35.05% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.28% | -4.38% | -5.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -8.49% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.83% | +1.07% |
Volatility
GAPAX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class A (GAPAX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that GAPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAPAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 3.26% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 6.89% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 11.48% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 12.89% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 14.89% | +3.05% |