GAOSX vs. TIBAX
GAOSX (JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund) and TIBAX (Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, GAOSX returned 7.36%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for TIBAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GAOSX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TIBAX.
Performance
GAOSX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAOSX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GAOSX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 7.36%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.
GAOSX
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 11.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
TIBAX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 35.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
GAOSX vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAOSX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund | 3.34% | 14.96% | 8.21% | 13.02% | -18.59% | 9.54% | 15.55% | 16.27% | -5.81% | 17.12% |
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 16.64% | 36.62% | 13.23% | 18.01% | -7.95% | 20.08% | -0.67% | 17.72% | -4.54% | 14.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAOSX and TIBAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013 | 0.81 |
The correlation between GAOSX and TIBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAOSX vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank
GAOSX
TIBAX
GAOSX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund (GAOSX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAOSX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.81 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 6.67 | -5.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 25.46 | -19.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAOSX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAOSX drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, smaller than the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAOSX and TIBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAOSX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -49.12% | +24.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -5.43% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | -9.20% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.98% | -20.94% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.98% | -34.85% | +9.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -1.08% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -5.98% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.42% | +0.78% |
Volatility
GAOSX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund (GAOSX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) at 2.91%. This indicates that GAOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAOSX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 2.91% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 7.36% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 8.78% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 11.15% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.81% | 13.42% | -2.61% |
GAOSX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAOSX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAOSX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison
GAOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%, more than TIBAX's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAOSX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund | 10.04% | 10.23% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 4.86% | 10.17% | 1.67% | 2.65% | 2.71% | 3.18% | 2.76% | 1.16% |
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 4.97% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 4.67% | 5.62% | 5.10% | 4.11% | 4.23% | 4.49% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAOSX and TIBAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAOSX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to TIBAX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAOSX dropped -24.98% vs TIBAX's -49.12%.
TIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAOSX and TIBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer