GAMPX vs. RICGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GAMPX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P) and RICGX ( The Investment Company of America Class R-6) are both mutual funds - GAMPX is a MLPs fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while RICGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAMPX returned 23.08%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for RICGX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAMPX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for RICGX.

Performance

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) and The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAMPX achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than RICGX's 8.99% return.

GAMPX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -5.48%
• YTD: 22.25%
• 6M: 22.15%
• 1Y: 26.10%
• 3Y*: 33.07%
• 5Y*: 23.08%
• 10Y*: —

RICGX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 8.38%
• 1Y: 23.09%
• 3Y*: 23.37%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: 14.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P	22.25%	5.43%	58.40%	15.11%	19.15%	38.33%	-17.23%	17.00%	-12.69%
RICGX The Investment Company of America Class R-6	8.99%	20.83%	25.28%	28.94%	-15.24%	25.49%	14.48%	24.88%	-6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GAMPX and RICGX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2018	0.51

The correlation between GAMPX and RICGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GAMPX vs. RICGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAMPX

GAMPX Risk / Return Rank: 46
GAMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GAMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
GAMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GAMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
GAMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

RICGX

RICGX Risk / Return Rank: 46
RICGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RICGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
RICGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RICGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
RICGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) and The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAMPX	RICGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.83	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.52	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.33	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	2.41	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	10.68	-2.56

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the RICGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAMPX and RICGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMPX drawdown since its inception was -59.18%, which is greater than RICGX's maximum drawdown of -31.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMPX and RICGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAMPX	RICGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.18%	-31.06%	-28.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-10.03%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.08%	-17.37%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.97%	-24.14%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.81%	-1.84%	-3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	-3.68%	-4.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	2.26%	+0.82%

Volatility

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) at 5.00%. This indicates that GAMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RICGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAMPX	RICGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	5.00%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	10.57%	+0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.67%	13.24%	+1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.56%	16.12%	+4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.78%	16.64%	+9.14%

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAMPX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than RICGX's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAMPX vs. RICGX - Dividend Comparison

GAMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than RICGX's 9.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P	8.29%	10.13%	25.55%	10.34%	4.76%	8.54%	4.33%	4.99%	3.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RICGX The Investment Company of America Class R-6	9.49%	10.89%	9.59%	5.25%	6.45%	7.24%	1.68%	6.74%	11.60%	7.36%	5.77%	9.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAMPX and RICGX in my portfolio?

GAMPX and RICGX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAMPX or RICGX?

GAMPX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to RICGX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMPX dropped -59.18% vs RICGX's -31.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RICGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.