GAGEX vs. BACIX
GAGEX (Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund) and BACIX (BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GAGEX returned 7.37%/yr vs 9.06%/yr for BACIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GAGEX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BACIX.
Performance
GAGEX vs. BACIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAGEX achieves a 33.96% return, which is significantly higher than BACIX's 29.12% return. Over the past 10 years, GAGEX has underperformed BACIX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while BACIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.06% annualized return.
GAGEX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- 33.96%
- 6M
- 30.60%
- 1Y
- 53.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
BACIX
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 29.12%
- 6M
- 27.86%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
GAGEX vs. BACIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 33.96% | 16.88% | -1.75% | 2.66% | 34.32% | 45.96% | -34.12% | 10.45% | -18.96% | -1.04% |
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 29.12% | 11.03% | 4.23% | 2.97% | 43.64% | 43.50% | -29.38% | 13.04% | -19.55% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAGEX and BACIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2005 | 0.95 |
The correlation between GAGEX and BACIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAGEX vs. BACIX — Risk / Return Rank
GAGEX
BACIX
GAGEX vs. BACIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAGEX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.45 | 4.80 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.92 | 14.31 | +5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAGEX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 2.52 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.81 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.20 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
GAGEX vs. BACIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAGEX drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, roughly equal to the maximum BACIX drawdown of -77.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAGEX and BACIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAGEX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -77.81% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -9.03% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.67% | -18.44% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -25.76% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.98% | -65.65% | -4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -5.73% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.23% | -32.36% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.02% | -0.27% |
Volatility
GAGEX vs. BACIX - Volatility Comparison
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) and BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) have volatilities of 7.20% and 6.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAGEX | BACIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 6.96% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 14.11% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.43% | 17.25% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 23.53% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 27.21% | +0.10% |
GAGEX vs. BACIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAGEX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BACIX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAGEX vs. BACIX - Dividend Comparison
GAGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than BACIX's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 2.16% | 2.79% | 2.63% | 3.39% | 2.49% | 2.67% | 3.66% | 3.06% | 3.43% | 2.76% | 2.38% | 2.51% |
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund | 2.11% | 2.82% | 7.08% | 4.33% | 0.15% | 2.59% | 3.59% | 1.91% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.13% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GAGEX and BACIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GAGEX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to BACIX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAGEX dropped -78.90% vs BACIX's -77.81%.
GAGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAGEX and BACIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer