PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAEM vs. EMTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GAEM vs. EMTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GAEM vs. EMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GAEM
Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF
-0.99%13.55%3.72%
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
-0.89%8.27%0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAEM achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than EMTL's -0.89% return.


GAEM

1D
0.27%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
1.83%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMTL

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
1.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GAEM vs. EMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAEM has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GAEM vs. EMTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAEM
GAEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

EMTL
EMTL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EMTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAEM vs. EMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAEMEMTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.39

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

1.86

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.83

+0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.63

5.81

+5.82

GAEM vs. EMTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EMTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAEM and EMTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAEMEMTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.39

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.04

0.71

+1.33

Correlation

The correlation between GAEM and EMTL is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GAEM vs. EMTL - Dividend Comparison

GAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than EMTL's 5.05% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GAEM
Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF
6.70%6.50%3.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
5.05%5.09%5.34%4.78%4.19%5.43%3.28%3.96%3.35%4.16%8.87%

Drawdowns

GAEM vs. EMTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAEM drawdown since its inception was -3.84%, smaller than the maximum EMTL drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAEM and EMTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GAEMEMTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-22.91%

+19.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-2.11%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-1.52%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-3.89%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.67%

+0.19%

Volatility

GAEM vs. EMTL - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF (GAEM) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) at 0.92%. This indicates that GAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GAEMEMTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

0.92%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

1.69%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

2.84%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

4.90%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

4.68%

+0.20%