PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GACA.DE achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than SC0H.DE's 11.30% return.


GACA.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.10%
YTD
10.44%
6M
10.26%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*

SC0H.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.30%
6M
10.69%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
15.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GACA.DE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
10.44%3.94%29.59%21.02%-14.66%38.66%7.33%8.54%
SC0H.DE
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
11.30%4.77%32.56%23.60%-15.55%38.99%9.76%9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GACA.DE and SC0H.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019

0.98

The correlation between GACA.DE and SC0H.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GACA.DE
GACA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GACA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GACA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0H.DE
SC0H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SC0H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GACA.DESC0H.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.45

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

11.96

-3.87

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GACA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the SC0H.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GACA.DE and SC0H.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GACA.DESC0H.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.16

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.94

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.98

-0.13

Drawdowns

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GACA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SC0H.DE drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACA.DE and SC0H.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GACA.DESC0H.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-34.20%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-7.32%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.68%

-23.66%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-23.66%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.41%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-4.13%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.11%

+0.46%

Volatility

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that GACA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SC0H.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GACA.DESC0H.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

2.68%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

7.66%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

11.67%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.41%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.23%

+0.99%

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GACA.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0H.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GACA.DE nor SC0H.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GACA.DE and SC0H.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SC0H.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0H.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GACA.DE.

GACA.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity, while SC0H.DE tracks MSCI USA. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GACA.DE and 0.05% for SC0H.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GACA.DE and SC0H.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer