GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE
GACA.DE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)) and SC0H.DE (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GACA.DE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity while SC0H.DE tracks the MSCI USA. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GACA.DE returned 13.63%/yr vs 14.59%/yr for SC0H.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GACA.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SC0H.DE.
Performance
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GACA.DE achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than SC0H.DE's 11.30% return.
GACA.DE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
SC0H.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GACA.DE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 10.44% | 3.94% | 29.59% | 21.02% | -14.66% | 38.66% | 7.33% | 8.54% |
SC0H.DE Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 11.30% | 4.77% | 32.56% | 23.60% | -15.55% | 38.99% | 9.76% | 9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GACA.DE and SC0H.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GACA.DE and SC0H.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GACA.DE
SC0H.DE
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GACA.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 3.45 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 11.96 | -3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GACA.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.16 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.94 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.98 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GACA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SC0H.DE drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACA.DE and SC0H.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GACA.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -34.20% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -7.32% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | -23.66% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | -23.66% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.41% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -4.13% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.11% | +0.46% |
Volatility
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that GACA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SC0H.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GACA.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 2.68% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 7.66% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 11.67% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 15.41% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 16.23% | +0.99% |
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GACA.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0H.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GACA.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GACA.DE nor SC0H.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GACA.DE and SC0H.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SC0H.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SC0H.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GACA.DE.
GACA.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity, while SC0H.DE tracks MSCI USA. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GACA.DE and 0.05% for SC0H.DE.
Find the right allocation for GACA.DE and SC0H.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer