GACA.DE vs. GACB.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE).
GACA.DE and GACB.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GACA.DE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity. It was launched on Sep 23, 2019. GACB.DE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity. It was launched on Nov 4, 2019. Both GACA.DE and GACB.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GACA.DE or GACB.DE.
Key characteristics
GACA.DE | GACB.DE | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 23.07% | 12.91% |
1Y Return | 31.28% | 16.35% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 9.73% | 1.02% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.73 | 1.25 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.57 | 1.80 |
Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.24 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.68 | 0.63 |
Martin Ratio | 16.09 | 6.19 |
Ulcer Index | 1.91% | 2.64% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.24% | 12.98% |
Max Drawdown | -33.50% | -31.63% |
Current Drawdown | -3.02% | -12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GACA.DE and GACB.DE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GACA.DE vs. GACB.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GACA.DE achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than GACB.DE's 12.91% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GACA.DE vs. GACB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GACA.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GACB.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GACA.DE vs. GACB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GACA.DE vs. GACB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GACA.DE nor GACB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GACA.DE vs. GACB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GACA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, which is greater than GACB.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACA.DE and GACB.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GACA.DE vs. GACB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) is 2.48%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that GACA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GACB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.