GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE
GACA.DE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)) and QDVR.DE (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GACA.DE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity while QDVR.DE tracks the MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GACA.DE returned 13.63%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for QDVR.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GACA.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QDVR.DE.
Performance
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GACA.DE achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than QDVR.DE's 14.85% return.
GACA.DE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVR.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 22.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- —
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GACA.DE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 10.44% | 3.94% | 29.59% | 21.02% | -14.66% | 38.66% | 7.33% | 8.54% |
QDVR.DE iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.85% | -0.76% | 20.30% | 20.26% | -14.38% | 43.66% | 13.50% | 9.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GACA.DE and QDVR.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GACA.DE and QDVR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GACA.DE
QDVR.DE
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GACA.DE | QDVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 3.09 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 10.29 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GACA.DE | QDVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.76 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.78 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.89 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GACA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVR.DE drawdown of -32.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACA.DE and QDVR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GACA.DE | QDVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -32.87% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -7.24% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | -23.91% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | -23.91% | +0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -4.41% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.18% | +0.39% |
Volatility
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) is 3.46%, while iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that GACA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GACA.DE | QDVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.67% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 9.02% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 12.69% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 15.53% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 16.34% | +0.88% |
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GACA.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVR.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GACA.DE vs. QDVR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GACA.DE nor QDVR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GACA.DE and QDVR.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GACA.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GACA.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVR.DE.
GACA.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity, while QDVR.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GACA.DE and 0.20% for QDVR.DE.
Find the right allocation for GACA.DE and QDVR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer