PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVR.DE achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than VGVF.DE's 12.58% return.


QDVR.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
6.37%
YTD
14.85%
6M
15.24%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*

VGVF.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.21%
YTD
12.58%
6M
13.33%
1Y
26.41%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QDVR.DE
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
14.85%-0.76%20.30%20.26%-14.38%43.66%8.47%
VGVF.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
12.58%8.99%24.73%20.35%-13.58%31.62%3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVR.DE and VGVF.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2020

0.91

The correlation between QDVR.DE and VGVF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVR.DE
QDVR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QDVR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VGVF.DE
VGVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVR.DEVGVF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

4.19

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

17.27

-6.98

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VGVF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVR.DE and VGVF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVR.DEVGVF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.34

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.93

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.79

+0.10

Drawdowns

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.87%, roughly equal to the maximum VGVF.DE drawdown of -33.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVR.DE and VGVF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVR.DEVGVF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

-33.54%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-6.28%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-21.17%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.91%

-21.17%

-2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-4.91%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.53%

+0.65%

Volatility

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDVR.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE) at 2.86%. This indicates that QDVR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVR.DEVGVF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

2.86%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

8.02%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

11.22%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

13.96%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

16.23%

+0.11%

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGVF.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVR.DE vs. VGVF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVR.DE nor VGVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVR.DE and VGVF.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGVF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVR.DE.

QDVR.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGVF.DE is Global Equities. QDVR.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while VGVF.DE tracks FTSE Developed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVR.DE and 0.12% for VGVF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVR.DE and VGVF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer